Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Calgary Walk In Clinics Offers Hope To The Poor And Needy

By Jordan Schmidt


When illness or any type of medical emergency occur everybody wants only the very best medical care. This is only natural, because health is the biggest and most important asset anyone has. Unfortunately, the very best medical care is very expensive. Only the very rich and those with adequate medical insurance can afford it. Fortunately, all is not lost for those that do not have medical insurance. Calgary walk in clinics can provide a wide variety of treatment options.

The broad definition of this type of medical institution includes a wide variety of facilities. Many facilities are conveniently situated inside shopping centres. Others are operated from the premises of sponsoring charities. Local health services also operate such facilities. Not all of these medical institutions have doctors on board. Prices range from free of charge to a minimal fee, mostly depending upon the type of service offered.

A lot of people think that all these facilities offer emergency treatment. This is definitely not the case. Many do, but many others offer limited services and are not equipped to deal with trauma and emergencies. The majority of facilities do not even employ a doctor. Those without health care benefits should familiarize themselves with the free and affordable facilities in their area.

The main advantage of these facilities is the fact that they are either free or very affordable. There are approximately eleven thousand such services country wide. Patients do not need an appointment. They can simply present themselves and services are very seldom refused. In most cases patients are seen on a first come first served basis. Of course, true emergencies will always receive preferential treatment.

There are drawbacks. Most of these medical facilities deal with large numbers. This means that queues can be long and waiting times can be exhausting. The attending staff does not have a lot of time for each individual patients because they have too many patients to see. Most facilities can only offer limited treatment options and sometimes patients simply cannot be helped.

Many critics slam these medical facilities as utterly inadequate for even very basic health care. They cite the facts that many facilities do not even have an attending doctor, that basic diagnostic tools are seldom present and that the range of medication offered to patients are rudimentary. Critics say that the staff at any of these facilities only had very basic training and that they should not be allowed to attend to patients without supervision.

Private medical practitioners also often criticise these facilities. They argue that it is impossible to properly treat a patient without a full history of his health. Without such a history it is not possible to diagnose potentially serious diseases on the basis of new symptoms. They say that these clinics, at best, treat symptoms and not the underlying conditions that cause those symptoms.

Nobody will argue the fact that proper health care for all should be a national priority. At present, the poor and needy simply have to make do with what is on offer. Ideally, every citizen should be able to depend upon quality care when they need it. In the meantime, affordable and free medical facilities fulfil a very urgent need.




About the Author:



0 comments:

Post a Comment